Frederic Lardinois’ article on March 23, 2010 refers to Twitter’s assertion that spam is not an issue. According to the latest data from Twitter, the percentage of spammy tweets per day is now down under 1%.
Here’s the issue. Our stats don’t support this assertion.
In fact, our numbers suggest that spammers are alive and well on Twitter. How do we arrive at this conclusion? In December of 2009 we launched TwitSweeper. Its only function is to detect undesirable followers (spam and spammers), identify them, and list them so TwitSweeper users can choose to remove and block them. It does this very well.
Here’s what we know.
To date TwitSweeper has checked more than 1.7 million followers. It has detected and flagged more than 83,000 followers as being spam or spammers. This suggests that almost 5% of all the followers we’ve checked are spammy.
The next question is: What is Spam?
The universal answer seems to be: “Everything I don’t want to receive from someone I don’t know.”
The problem with this definition is that it can include everything. Promoting body enhancement products is a nuisance to most, but a blessing to some. One man’s garbage is another man’s gold.
Is Twitter doing a good job going after spammers? I’m sure they are making best efforts. Are they winning the battle? It’s too early to say. Do they have spam down to 1%? Our stats certainly don’t confirm that. If our stats indicate that 5% of followers are spammers, you’ve got to know the actual number is even higher.
Conclusion: As TwitSweeper’s Spam Detection Methodology continues to improve, we see a corresponding rise in spammy followers that are found. This suggests there are more spammers out there. Whereas, Twitter’s reported 1% spam figure is merely the portion of spam that they happen to have found so far.
In the end, everyone’s objective should be to keep the Twitter ecosystem clean of spam. But we aren’t there yet.